Maximum Defective Clique Computation: Improved Time Complexities and Practical Performance

March 12, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Lijun Chang arXiv ID 2403.07561 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.SI Citations 5 Venue Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The concept of $k$-defective clique, a relaxation of clique by allowing up-to $k$ missing edges, has been receiving increasing interests recently. Although the problem of finding the maximum $k$-defective clique is NP-hard, several practical algorithms have been recently proposed in the literature, with kDC being the state of the art. kDC not only runs the fastest in practice, but also achieves the best time complexity. Specifically, it runs in $O^*(Ξ³_k^n)$ time when ignoring polynomial factors; here, $Ξ³_k$ is a constant that is smaller than two and only depends on $k$, and $n$ is the number of vertices in the input graph $G$. In this paper, we propose the kDC-Two algorithm to improve the time complexity as well as practical performance. kDC-Two runs in $O^*( (Ξ±Ξ”)^{k+2} Ξ³_{k-1}^Ξ±)$ time when the maximum $k$-defective clique size $Ο‰_k(G)$ is at least $k+2$, and in $O^*(Ξ³_{k-1}^n)$ time otherwise, where $Ξ±$ and $Ξ”$ are the degeneracy and maximum degree of $G$, respectively. In addition, with slight modification, kDC-Two also runs in $O^*( (Ξ±Ξ”)^{k+2} (k+1)^{Ξ±+k+1-Ο‰_k(G)})$ time by using the degeneracy gap $Ξ±+k+1-Ο‰_k(G)$ parameterization; this is better than $O^*( (Ξ±Ξ”)^{k+2}Ξ³_{k-1}^Ξ±)$ when $Ο‰_k(G)$ is close to the degeneracy-based upper bound $Ξ±+k+1$. Finally, to further improve the practical performance, we propose a new degree-sequence-based reduction rule that can be efficiently applied, and theoretically demonstrate its effectiveness compared with those proposed in the literature. Extensive empirical studies on three benchmark graph collections show that our algorithm outperforms the existing fastest algorithm by several orders of magnitude.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted