How Can Large Language Models Enable Better Socially Assistive Human-Robot Interaction: A Brief Survey

April 01, 2024 Β· The Cartographer Β· πŸ› AAAI Spring Symposia

πŸ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper β€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: How Can Large Language Models Enable Better Socially Assistive Human-Robot Interaction: A Brief Surv"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zhonghao Shi, Ellen Landrum, Amy O' Connell, Mina Kian, Leticia Pinto-Alva, Kaleen Shrestha, Xiaoyuan Zhu, Maja J Matarić arXiv ID 2404.00938 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.CL, cs.CV, cs.RO Citations 13 Venue AAAI Spring Symposia Last Checked 23 hours ago
Abstract
Socially assistive robots (SARs) have shown great success in providing personalized cognitive-affective support for user populations with special needs such as older adults, children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and individuals with mental health challenges. The large body of work on SAR demonstrates its potential to provide at-home support that complements clinic-based interventions delivered by mental health professionals, making these interventions more effective and accessible. However, there are still several major technical challenges that hinder SAR-mediated interactions and interventions from reaching human-level social intelligence and efficacy. With the recent advances in large language models (LLMs), there is an increased potential for novel applications within the field of SAR that can significantly expand the current capabilities of SARs. However, incorporating LLMs introduces new risks and ethical concerns that have not yet been encountered, and must be carefully be addressed to safely deploy these more advanced systems. In this work, we aim to conduct a brief survey on the use of LLMs in SAR technologies, and discuss the potentials and risks of applying LLMs to the following three major technical challenges of SAR: 1) natural language dialog; 2) multimodal understanding; 3) LLMs as robot policies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction