Faster Algorithms for Dual-Failure Replacement Paths

April 22, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Shiri Chechik, Tianyi Zhang arXiv ID 2404.13907 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 2 Venue International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Given a simple weighted directed graph $G = (V, E, Ο‰)$ on $n$ vertices as well as two designated terminals $s, t\in V$, our goal is to compute the shortest path from $s$ to $t$ avoiding any pair of presumably failed edges $f_1, f_2\in E$, which is a natural generalization of the classical replacement path problem which considers single edge failures only. This dual failure replacement paths problem was recently studied by Vassilevska Williams, Woldeghebriel and Xu [FOCS 2022] who designed a cubic time algorithm for general weighted digraphs which is conditionally optimal; in the same paper, for unweighted graphs where $Ο‰\equiv 1$, the authors presented an algebraic algorithm with runtime $\tilde{O}(n^{2.9146})$, as well as a conditional lower bound of $n^{8/3-o(1)}$ against combinatorial algorithms. However, it was unknown in their work whether fast matrix multiplication is necessary for a subcubic runtime in unweighted digraphs. As our primary result, we present the first truly subcubic combinatorial algorithm for dual failure replacement paths in unweighted digraphs. Our runtime is $\tilde{O}(n^{3-1/18})$. Besides, we also study algebraic algorithms for digraphs with small integer edge weights from $\{-M, -M+1, \cdots, M-1, M\}$. As our secondary result, we obtained a runtime of $\tilde{O}(Mn^{2.8716})$, which is faster than the previous bound of $\tilde{O}(M^{2/3}n^{2.9144} + Mn^{2.8716})$ from [Vassilevska Williams, Woldeghebriela and Xu, 2022].
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted