Risk or Chance? Large Language Models and Reproducibility in HCI Research

April 24, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Interactions

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Thomas Kosch, Sebastian Feger arXiv ID 2404.15782 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 10 Venue Interactions Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Reproducibility is a major concern across scientific fields. Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), in particular, is subject to diverse reproducibility challenges due to the wide range of research methodologies employed. In this article, we explore how the increasing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) across all user experience (UX) design and research activities impacts reproducibility in HCI. In particular, we review upcoming reproducibility challenges through the lenses of analogies from past to future (mis)practices like p-hacking and prompt-hacking, general bias, support in data analysis, documentation and education requirements, and possible pressure on the community. We discuss the risks and chances for each of these lenses with the expectation that a more comprehensive discussion will help shape best practices and contribute to valid and reproducible practices around using LLMs in HCI research.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted