Transparent AI: Developing an Explainable Interface for Predicting Postoperative Complications

April 18, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Yuanfang Ren, Chirayu Tripathi, Ziyuan Guan, Ruilin Zhu, Victoria Hougha, Yingbo Ma, Zhenhong Hu, Jeremy Balch, Tyler J. Loftus, Parisa Rashidi, Benjamin Shickel, Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Azra Bihorac arXiv ID 2404.16064 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.LG, cs.LO Citations 2 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Given the sheer volume of surgical procedures and the significant rate of postoperative fatalities, assessing and managing surgical complications has become a critical public health concern. Existing artificial intelligence (AI) tools for risk surveillance and diagnosis often lack adequate interpretability, fairness, and reproducibility. To address this, we proposed an Explainable AI (XAI) framework designed to answer five critical questions: why, why not, how, what if, and what else, with the goal of enhancing the explainability and transparency of AI models. We incorporated various techniques such as Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), counterfactual explanations, model cards, an interactive feature manipulation interface, and the identification of similar patients to address these questions. We showcased an XAI interface prototype that adheres to this framework for predicting major postoperative complications. This initial implementation has provided valuable insights into the vast explanatory potential of our XAI framework and represents an initial step towards its clinical adoption.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted