Dynamic PageRank: Algorithms and Lower Bounds

April 25, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Rajesh Jayaram, Jakub Łącki, Slobodan MitroviΔ‡, Krzysztof Onak, Piotr Sankowski arXiv ID 2404.16267 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 5 Venue International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We consider the PageRank problem in the dynamic setting, where the goal is to explicitly maintain an approximate PageRank vector $Ο€\in \mathbb{R}^n$ for a graph under a sequence of edge insertions and deletions. Our main result is a complete characterization of the complexity of dynamic PageRank maintenance for both multiplicative and additive ($L_1$) approximations. First, we establish matching lower and upper bounds for maintaining additive approximate PageRank in both incremental and decremental settings. In particular, we demonstrate that in the worst-case $(1/Ξ±)^{Θ(\log \log n)}$ update time is necessary and sufficient for this problem, where $Ξ±$ is the desired additive approximation. On the other hand, we demonstrate that the commonly employed ForwardPush approach performs substantially worse than this optimal runtime. Specifically, we show that ForwardPush requires $Ξ©(n^{1-Ξ΄})$ time per update on average, for any $Ξ΄> 0$, even in the incremental setting. For multiplicative approximations, however, we demonstrate that the situation is significantly more challenging. Specifically, we prove that any algorithm that explicitly maintains a constant factor multiplicative approximation of the PageRank vector of a directed graph must have amortized update time $Ξ©(n^{1-Ξ΄})$, for any $Ξ΄> 0$, even in the incremental setting, thereby resolving a 13-year old open question of Bahmani et al.~(VLDB 2010). This sharply contrasts with the undirected setting, where we show that $\rm{poly}\ \log n$ update time is feasible, even in the fully dynamic setting under oblivious adversary.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted