Understanding the Cluster LP for Correlation Clustering

April 26, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Symposium on the Theory of Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nairen Cao, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Euiwoong Lee, Shi Li, Alantha Newman, Lukas Vogl arXiv ID 2404.17509 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 23 Venue Symposium on the Theory of Computing Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In the classic Correlation Clustering problem introduced by Bansal, Blum, and Chawla (FOCS 2002), the input is a complete graph where edges are labeled either $+$ or $-$, and the goal is to find a partition of the vertices that minimizes the sum of the +edges across parts plus the sum of the -edges within parts. In recent years, Chawla, Makarychev, Schramm and Yaroslavtsev (STOC 2015) gave a 2.06-approximation by providing a near-optimal rounding of the standard LP, and Cohen-Addad, Lee, Li, and Newman (FOCS 2022, 2023) finally bypassed the integrality gap of 2 for this LP giving a $1.73$-approximation for the problem. In order to create a simple and unified framework for Correlation Clustering similar to those for typical approximate optimization tasks, we propose the cluster LP as a strong linear program for Correlation Clustering. We demonstrate the power of the cluster LP by presenting new rounding algorithms, and providing two analyses, one analytically proving a 1.56-approximation and the other solving a factor-revealing SDP to show a 1.485-approximation. Both proofs introduce principled methods by which to analyze the performance of the algorithm, resulting in a significantly improved approximation guarantee. Finally, we prove an integrality gap of $4/3$ for the cluster LP, showing our 1.485-upper bound cannot be drastically improved. Our gap instance directly inspires an improved NP-hardness of approximation with a ratio $24/23 \approx 1.042$; no explicit hardness ratio was known before.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted