Root-to-Leaf Scheduling in Write-Optimized Trees
April 26, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Christopher Chung, William Jannen, Samuel McCauley, Bertrand Simon
arXiv ID
2404.17544
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Write-optimized dictionaries are a class of cache-efficient data structures that buffer updates and apply them in batches to optimize the amortized cache misses per update. For example, a B^epsilon tree inserts updates as messages at the root. B^epsilon trees only move ("flush") messages when they have total size close to a cache line, optimizing the amount of work done per cache line written. Thus, recently-inserted messages reside at or near the root and are only flushed down the tree after a sufficient number of new messages arrive. Although this lazy approach works well for many operations, some types of updates do not complete until the update message reaches a leaf. For example, deferred queries and secure deletes must flush through all nodes along their root-to-leaf path before taking effect. What happens when we want to service a large number of (say) secure deletes as quickly as possible? Classic techniques leave us with an unsavory choice. On the one hand, we can group the delete messages using a write-optimized approach and move them down the tree lazily. But then many individual deletes may be left incomplete for an extended period of time, as their messages wait to be grouped with a sufficiently large number of related messages. On the other hand, we can ignore cache efficiency and perform a root-to-leaf flush for each delete. This begins work on individual deletes immediately, but harms system throughput. This paper investigates a new framework for efficiently flushing collections of messages from the root to their leaves in a write-optimized data structure. Our goal is to minimize the average time that messages reach the leaves. We give an algorithm that O(1)-approximates the optimal average completion time in this model. Along the way, we give a new 4-approximation algorithm for scheduling parallel tasks for weighted completion time with tree precedence constraints.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted