Greater benefits of deep learning-based computer-aided detection systems for finding small signals in 3D volumetric medical images
April 30, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Journal of Medical Imaging
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Devi Klein, Srijita Karmakar, Aditya Jonnalagadda, Craig K. Abbey, Miguel P. Eckstein
arXiv ID
2405.00144
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
0
Venue
Journal of Medical Imaging
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Purpose: Radiologists are tasked with visually scrutinizing large amounts of data produced by 3D volumetric imaging modalities. Small signals can go unnoticed during the 3d search because they are hard to detect in the visual periphery. Recent advances in machine learning and computer vision have led to effective computer-aided detection (CADe) support systems with the potential to mitigate perceptual errors. Approach: Sixteen non-expert observers searched through digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) phantoms and single cross-sectional slices of the DBT phantoms. The 3D/2D searches occurred with and without a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based CADe support system. The model provided observers with bounding boxes superimposed on the image stimuli while they looked for a small microcalcification signal and a large mass signal. Eye gaze positions were recorded and correlated with changes in the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: The CNN-CADe improved the 3D search for the small microcalcification signal (delta AUC = 0.098, p = 0.0002) and the 2D search for the large mass signal (delta AUC = 0.076, p = 0.002). The CNN-CADe benefit in 3D for the small signal was markedly greater than in 2D (delta delta AUC = 0.066, p = 0.035). Analysis of individual differences suggests that those who explored the least with eye movements benefited the most from the CNN-CADe (r = -0.528, p = 0.036). However, for the large signal, the 2D benefit was not significantly greater than the 3D benefit (delta delta AUC = 0.033, p = 0.133). Conclusion: The CNN-CADe brings unique performance benefits to the 3D (vs. 2D) search of small signals by reducing errors caused by the under-exploration of the volumetric data.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted