Counting Cohesive Subgraphs with Hereditary Properties

May 08, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› The Web Conference

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Rong-Hua Li, Xiaowei Ye, Fusheng Jin, Yu-Ping Wang, Ye Yuan, Guoren Wang arXiv ID 2405.04823 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue The Web Conference Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Counting small cohesive subgraphs in a graph is a fundamental operation with numerous applications in graph analysis. Previous studies on cohesive subgraph counting are mainly based on the clique model, which aim to count the number of $k$-cliques in a graph with a small $k$. However, the clique model often proves too restrictive for practical use. To address this issue, we investigate a new problem of counting cohesive subgraphs that adhere to the hereditary property. Here the hereditary property means that if a graph $G$ has a property $\mathcal{P}$, then any induced subgraph of $G$ also has a property $\mathcal{P}$. To count these hereditary cohesive subgraphs (\hcss), we propose a new listing-based framework called \hcslist, which employs a backtracking enumeration procedure to count all \hcss. A notable limitation of \hcslist is that it requires enumerating all \hcss, making it intractable for large and dense graphs due to the exponential growth in the number of \hcss with respect to graph size. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel pivot-based framework called \hcspivot, which can count most \hcss in a combinatorial manner without explicitly listing them. Two additional noteworthy features of \hcspivot is its ability to (1) simultaneously count \hcss of any size and (2) simultaneously count \hcss for each vertex or each edge, while \hcslist is only capable of counting a specific size of \hcs and obtaining a total count of \hcss in a graph. We focus specifically on two \hcs: $s$-defective clique and $s$-plex, with several non-trivial pruning techniques to enhance the efficiency. We conduct extensive experiments on 8 large real-world graphs, and the results demonstrate the high efficiency and effectiveness of our solutions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted