Comparison of Access Control Approaches for Graph-Structured Data
May 31, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Security and Cryptography
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Aya Mohamed, Dagmar Auer, Daniel Hofer, Josef Kueng
arXiv ID
2405.20762
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Citations
0
Venue
International Conference on Security and Cryptography
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Access control is the enforcement of the authorization policy, which defines subjects, resources, and access rights. Graph-structured data requires advanced, flexible, and fine-grained access control due to its complex structure as sequences of alternating vertices and edges. Several research works focus on protecting property graph-structured data, enforcing fine-grained access control, and proving the feasibility and applicability of their concept. However, they differ conceptually and technically. We select works from our systematic literature review on authorization and access control for different database models in addition to recent ones. Based on defined criteria, we exclude research works with different objectives, such as no protection of graph-structured data, graph models other than the property graph, coarse-grained access control approaches, or no application in a graph datastore (i.e., no proof-of-concept implementation). The latest version of the remaining works are discussed in detail in terms of their access control approach as well as authorization policy definition and enforcement. Finally, we analyze the strengths and limitations of the selected works and provide a comparison with respect to different aspects, including the base access control model, open/closed policy, negative permission support, and datastore-independent enforcement.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted