Continual Counting with Gradual Privacy Expiration
June 06, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Neural Information Processing Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Joel Daniel Andersson, Monika Henzinger, Rasmus Pagh, Teresa Anna Steiner, Jalaj Upadhyay
arXiv ID
2406.03802
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Cross-listed
cs.DS
Citations
3
Venue
Neural Information Processing Systems
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Differential privacy with gradual expiration models the setting where data items arrive in a stream and at a given time $t$ the privacy loss guaranteed for a data item seen at time $(t-d)$ is $Ξ΅g(d)$, where $g$ is a monotonically non-decreasing function. We study the fundamental $\textit{continual (binary) counting}$ problem where each data item consists of a bit, and the algorithm needs to output at each time step the sum of all the bits streamed so far. For a stream of length $T$ and privacy $\textit{without}$ expiration continual counting is possible with maximum (over all time steps) additive error $O(\log^2(T)/\varepsilon)$ and the best known lower bound is $Ξ©(\log(T)/\varepsilon)$; closing this gap is a challenging open problem. We show that the situation is very different for privacy with gradual expiration by giving upper and lower bounds for a large set of expiration functions $g$. Specifically, our algorithm achieves an additive error of $ O(\log(T)/Ξ΅)$ for a large set of privacy expiration functions. We also give a lower bound that shows that if $C$ is the additive error of any $Ξ΅$-DP algorithm for this problem, then the product of $C$ and the privacy expiration function after $2C$ steps must be $Ξ©(\log(T)/Ξ΅)$. Our algorithm matches this lower bound as its additive error is $O(\log(T)/Ξ΅)$, even when $g(2C) = O(1)$. Our empirical evaluation shows that we achieve a slowly growing privacy loss with significantly smaller empirical privacy loss for large values of $d$ than a natural baseline algorithm.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted