Comparative Performance of the AVL Tree and Three Variants of the Red-Black Tree

June 07, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Software, Practice & Experience

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Russell A. Brown arXiv ID 2406.05162 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 2 Venue Software, Practice & Experience Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
This article compares the performance of the AVL tree to the performance of the bottom-up, top-down, and left-leaning red-black trees. The bottom-up red-black tree is faster than the AVL tree for insertion and deletion of randomly ordered keys. The AVL tree is faster than the bottom-up red-black tree for insertion but slower for deletion of consecutively ordered keys. The top-down red-black tree is faster than the bottom-up red-black tree for insertion but slower for deletion of randomly ordered keys, and slower for insertion and deletion of consecutively ordered keys. The left-leaning red-black tree is slower than the three other trees for insertion and deletion of randomly and consecutively ordered keys. An alternative deletion algorithm, which reduces the number of rebalancing operations required by deletion, is analyzed.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted