Understanding Open Source Contributor Profiles in Popular Machine Learning Libraries

June 09, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jiawen Liu, Haoxiang Zhang, Ying Zou arXiv ID 2406.05685 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 1 Venue ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
With the increasing popularity of machine learning (ML), many open-source software (OSS) contributors are attracted to developing and adopting ML approaches. Comprehensive understanding of ML contributors is crucial for successful ML OSS development and maintenance. Without such knowledge, there is a risk of inefficient resource allocation and hindered collaboration in ML OSS projects. Existing research focuses on understanding the difficulties and challenges perceived by ML contributors by user surveys. There is a lack of understanding of ML contributors based on their activities tracked from software repositories. In this paper, we aim to understand ML contributors by identifying contributor profiles in ML libraries. We further study contributors' OSS engagement from three aspects: workload composition, work preferences, and technical importance. By investigating 7,640 contributors from 6 popular ML libraries (TensorFlow, PyTorch, Keras, MXNet, Theano, and ONNX), we identify four contributor profiles: Core-Afterhour, Core-Workhour, Peripheral-Afterhour, and Peripheral-Workhour. We find that: 1) project experience, authored files, collaborations, and geographical location are significant features of all profiles; 2) contributors in Core profiles exhibit significantly different OSS engagement compared to Peripheral profiles; 3) contributors' work preferences and workload compositions significantly impact project popularity; 4) long-term contributors evolve towards making fewer, constant, balanced and less technical contributions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted