A Review of 315 Benchmark and Test Functions for Machine Learning Optimization Algorithms and Metaheuristics with Mathematical and Visual Descriptions

June 13, 2024 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper โ€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: A Review of 315 Benchmark and Test Functions for Machine Learning Optimization Algorithms and Metahe"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors M. Z. Naser, Mohammad Khaled al-Bashiti, Arash Teymori Gharah Tapeh, Armin Dadras Eslamlou, Ahmed Naser, Venkatesh Kodur, Rami Hawileeh, Jamal Abdalla, Nima Khodadadi, Amir H. Gandomi arXiv ID 2406.09581 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.NE Citations 6 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 3 days ago
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving optimization and metaheuristics domains, the efficacy of algorithms is crucially determined by the benchmark (test) functions. While several functions have been developed and derived over the past decades, little information is available on the mathematical and visual description, range of suitability, and applications of many such functions. To bridge this knowledge gap, this review provides an exhaustive survey of more than 300 benchmark functions used in the evaluation of optimization and metaheuristics algorithms. This review first catalogs benchmark and test functions based on their characteristics, complexity, properties, visuals, and domain implications to offer a wide view that aids in selecting appropriate benchmarks for various algorithmic challenges. This review also lists the 25 most commonly used functions in the open literature and proposes two new, highly dimensional, dynamic and challenging functions that could be used for testing new algorithms. Finally, this review identifies gaps in current benchmarking practices and suggests directions for future research.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning