LMM-enhanced Safety-Critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving System Testing From Non-Accident Traffic Videos
June 16, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Haoxiang Tian, Xingshuo Han, Yuan Zhou, Guoquan Wu, An Guo, Mingfei Cheng, Shuo Li, Jun Wei, Tianwei Zhang
arXiv ID
2406.10857
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Citations
7
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Safety testing serves as the fundamental pillar for the development of autonomous driving systems (ADSs). To ensure the safety of ADSs, it is paramount to generate a diverse range of safety-critical test scenarios. While existing ADS practitioners primarily focus on reproducing real-world traffic accidents in simulation environments to create test scenarios, it's essential to highlight that many of these accidents do not directly result in safety violations for ADSs due to the differences between human driving and autonomous driving. More importantly, we observe that some accident-free real-world scenarios can not only lead to misbehaviors in ADSs but also be leveraged for the generation of ADS violations during simulation testing. Therefore, it is of significant importance to discover safety violations of ADSs from routine traffic scenarios (i.e., non-crash scenarios). We introduce LEADE, a novel methodology to achieve the above goal. It automatically generates abstract and concrete scenarios from real-traffic videos. Then it optimizes these scenarios to search for safety violations of the ADS in semantically consistent scenarios where human-driving worked safely. Specifically, LEADE enhances the ability of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to accurately construct abstract scenarios from traffic videos and generate concrete scenarios by multi-modal few-shot Chain of Thought (CoT). Based on them, LEADE assesses and increases the behavior differences between the ego vehicle and human-driving in semantic equivalent scenarios (here equivalent semantics means that each participant in test scenarios has the same behaviors as those observed in the original real traffic scenarios). We implement and evaluate LEADE on the industrial-grade Level-4 ADS, Apollo.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted