Generating Is Believing: Membership Inference Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Generation
June 27, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yuying Li, Gaoyang Liu, Chen Wang, Yang Yang
arXiv ID
2406.19234
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Cross-listed
cs.AI
Citations
20
Venue
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a state-of-the-art technique that mitigates issues such as hallucinations and knowledge staleness in Large Language Models (LLMs) by retrieving relevant knowledge from an external database to assist in content generation. Existing research has demonstrated potential privacy risks associated with the LLMs of RAG. However, the privacy risks posed by the integration of an external database, which often contains sensitive data such as medical records or personal identities, have remained largely unexplored. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by focusing on membership privacy of RAG's external database, with the aim of determining whether a given sample is part of the RAG's database. Our basic idea is that if a sample is in the external database, it will exhibit a high degree of semantic similarity to the text generated by the RAG system. We present S$^2$MIA, a \underline{M}embership \underline{I}nference \underline{A}ttack that utilizes the \underline{S}emantic \underline{S}imilarity between a given sample and the content generated by the RAG system. With our proposed S$^2$MIA, we demonstrate the potential to breach the membership privacy of the RAG database. Extensive experiment results demonstrate that S$^2$MIA can achieve a strong inference performance compared with five existing MIAs, and is able to escape from the protection of three representative defenses.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted