A survey on the impacts of recommender systems on users, items, and human-AI ecosystems

June 29, 2024 ยท The Cartographer ยท + Add venue

๐Ÿ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper โ€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: A survey on the impacts of recommender systems on users, items, and human-AI ecosystems"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Luca Pappalardo, Salvatore Citraro, Giuliano Cornacchia, Mirco Nanni, Valentina Pansanella, Giulio Rossetti, Gizem Gezici, Fosca Giannotti, Margherita Lalli, Giovanni Mauro, Gabriele Barlacchi, Daniele Gambetta, Virginia Morini, Dino Pedreschi, Emanuele Ferragina arXiv ID 2407.01630 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CY, cs.HC Citations 16 Last Checked 2 days ago
Abstract
Recommendation systems and assistants (in short, recommenders) influence through online platforms most actions of our daily lives, suggesting items or providing solutions based on users' preferences or requests. This survey systematically reviews, categories, and discusses the impact of recommenders in four human-AI ecosystems -- social media, online retail, urban mapping and generative AI ecosystems. Its scope is to systematise a fast-growing field in which terminologies employed to classify methodologies and outcomes are fragmented and unsystematic. This is a crucial contribution to the literature because terminologies vary substantially across disciplines and ecosystems, hindering comparison and accumulation of knowledge in the field. We follow the customary steps of qualitative systematic review, gathering 154 articles from different disciplines to develop a parsimonious taxonomy of methodologies employed (empirical, simulation, observational, controlled), outcomes observed (concentration, content degradation, discrimination, diversity, echo chamber, filter bubble, homogenisation, polarisation, radicalisation, volume), and their level of analysis (individual, item, and ecosystem). We systematically discuss substantive and methodological commonalities across ecosystems, and highlight potential avenues for future research. The survey is addressed to scholars and practitioners interested in different human-AI ecosystems, policymakers and institutional stakeholders who want to understand better the measurable outcomes of recommenders, and tech companies who wish to obtain a systematic view of the impact of their recommenders.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Information Retrieval