Systematic literature review of the trust reinforcement mechanisms exist in package ecosystems

June 26, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Angel Temelko, Fang Hou, Siamak Farshidi, Slinger Jansen arXiv ID 2407.02522 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We conducted a thorough SLR to better grasp the challenges and possible solutions associated with existing npm security tools. Our goal was to delve into documented experiences and findings. Specifically, we were keen to learn about the motivations behind choosing third-party packages, software engineers' responses to warning messages, and their overall understanding of security issues. The main aim of this review was to pinpoint prevailing trends, methods, and concerns in trust tools for the present npm environment. Furthermore, we sought to understand the complexities of integrating SECO into platforms such as npm. By analyzing earlier studies, our intention was to spot any overlooked areas and steer our research to address them.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted