Negative Results of Image Processing for Identifying Duplicate Questions on Stack Overflow

July 08, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Faiz Ahmed, Suprakash Datta, Maleknaz Nayebi arXiv ID 2407.05523 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 8 Venue International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving landscape of developer communities, Q&A platforms serve as crucial resources for crowdsourcing developers' knowledge. A notable trend is the increasing use of images to convey complex queries more effectively. However, the current state-of-the-art method of duplicate question detection has not kept pace with this shift, which predominantly concentrates on text-based analysis. Inspired by advancements in image processing and numerous studies in software engineering illustrating the promising future of image-based communication on social coding platforms, we delved into image-based techniques for identifying duplicate questions on Stack Overflow. When focusing solely on text analysis of Stack Overflow questions and omitting the use of images, our automated models overlook a significant aspect of the question. Previous research has demonstrated the complementary nature of images to text. To address this, we implemented two methods of image analysis: first, integrating the text from images into the question text, and second, evaluating the images based on their visual content using image captions. After a rigorous evaluation of our model, it became evident that the efficiency improvements achieved were relatively modest, approximately an average of 1%. This marginal enhancement falls short of what could be deemed a substantial impact. As an encouraging aspect, our work lays the foundation for easy replication and hypothesis validation, allowing future research to build upon our approach.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted