Maximum Unique Coverage on Streams: Improved FPT Approximation Scheme and Tighter Space Lower Bound

July 12, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Philip Cervenjak, Junhao Gan, Seeun William Umboh, Anthony Wirth arXiv ID 2407.09368 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We consider the Max Unique Coverage problem, including applications to the data stream model. The input is a universe of $n$ elements, a collection of $m$ subsets of this universe, and a cardinality constraint, $k$. The goal is to select a subcollection of at most $k$ sets that maximizes unique coverage, i.e, the number of elements contained in exactly one of the selected sets. The Max Unique Coverage problem has applications in wireless networks, radio broadcast, and envy-free pricing. Our first main result is a fixed-parameter tractable approximation scheme (FPT-AS) for Max Unique Coverage, parameterized by $k$ and the maximum element frequency, $r$, which can be implemented on a data stream. Our FPT-AS finds a $(1-Ξ΅)$-approximation while maintaining a kernel of size $\tilde{O}(k r/Ξ΅)$, which can be combined with subsampling to use $\tilde{O}(k^2 r / Ξ΅^3)$ space overall. This significantly improves on the previous-best FPT-AS with the same approximation, but a kernel of size $\tilde{O}(k^2 r / Ξ΅^2)$. In order to achieve our result, we show upper bounds on the ratio of a collection's coverage to the unique coverage of a maximizing subcollection; this is by constructing explicit algorithms that find a subcollection with unique coverage at least a logarithmic ratio of the collection's coverage. We complement our algorithms with our second main result, showing that $Ξ©(m / k^2)$ space is necessary to achieve a $(1.5 + o(1))/(\ln k - 1)$-approximation in the data stream. This dramatically improves the previous-best lower bound showing that $Ξ©(m / k^2)$ is necessary to achieve better than a $e^{-1+1/k}$-approximation.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted