Cut-Preserving Vertex Sparsifiers for Planar and Quasi-bipartite Graphs
July 15, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yu Chen, Zihan Tan
arXiv ID
2407.10852
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
2
Venue
International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We study vertex sparsification for preserving cuts. Given a graph $G$ with a subset $|T|=k$ of its vertices called terminals, a \emph{quality-$q$ cut sparsifier} is a graph $G'$ that contains $T$, such that, for any partition $(T_1,T_2)$ of $T$ into non-empty subsets, the value of the min-cut in $G'$ separating $T_1$ from $T_2$ is within factor $q$ from the value of the min-cut in $G$ separating $T_1$ from $T_2$. The construction of cut sparsifiers with good (small) quality and size has been a central problem in graph compression for years. Planar graphs and quasi-bipartite graphs are two important special families studied in this research direction. The main results in this paper are new cut sparsifier constructions for them in the high-quality regime (where $q=1$ or $1+\varepsilon$ for small $\varepsilon>0$). We first show that every planar graph admits a planar quality-$(1+\varepsilon)$ cut sparsifier of size $\tilde O(k/\text{poly}(\varepsilon))$, which is in sharp contrast with the lower bound of $2^{Ξ©(k)}$ for the quality-$1$ case. We then show that every quasi-bipartite graph admits a quality-$1$ cut sparsifier of size $2^{\tilde O(k^2)}$. This is the second to improve over the doubly-exponential bound for general graphs (previously only planar graphs have been shown to have single-exponential size quality-$1$ cut sparsifiers). Lastly, we show that contraction, a common approach for constructing cut sparsifiers adopted in most previous works, does not always give optimal bounds for cut sparsifiers. We demonstrate this by showing that the optimal size bound for quality-$(1+\varepsilon)$ contraction-based cut sparsifiers for quasi-bipartite graphs lies in the range $[k^{\tildeΞ©(1/\varepsilon)},k^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)}]$, while in previous work an upper bound of $\tilde O(k/\varepsilon^2)$ was achieved via a non-contraction approach.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted