VCEval: Rethinking What is a Good Educational Video and How to Automatically Evaluate It

June 15, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xiaoxuan Zhu, Zhouhong Gu, Sihang Jiang, Zhixu Li, Hongwei Feng, Yanghua Xiao arXiv ID 2407.12005 Category cs.MM: Multimedia Cross-listed cs.CV Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Online courses have significantly lowered the barrier to accessing education, yet the varying content quality of these videos poses challenges. In this work, we focus on the task of automatically evaluating the quality of video course content. We have constructed a dataset with a substantial collection of video courses and teaching materials. We propose three evaluation principles and design a new evaluation framework, \textit{VCEval}, based on these principles. The task is modeled as a multiple-choice question-answering task, with a language model serving as the evaluator. Our method effectively distinguishes video courses of different content quality and produces a range of interpretable results.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Multimedia

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Video Generation From Text

Yitong Li, Martin Renqiang Min, ... (+3 more)

cs.MM πŸ› AAAI πŸ“š 300 cites 8 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted