Modified-Improved Fitness Dependent Optimizer for Complex and Engineering Problems
June 27, 2024 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Knowledge-Based Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Hozan K. Hamarashid, Bryar A. Hassan, Tarik A. Rashid
arXiv ID
2407.14271
Category
cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary
Cross-listed
cs.CE
Citations
9
Venue
Knowledge-Based Systems
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Fitness dependent optimizer (FDO) is considered one of the novel swarm intelligent algorithms. Recently, FDO has been enhanced several times to improve its capability. One of the improvements is called improved FDO (IFDO). However, according to the research findings, the variants of FDO are constrained by two primary limitations that have been identified. Firstly, if the number of agents employed falls below five, it significantly diminishes the algorithm's precision. Secondly, the efficacy of FDO is intricately tied to the quantity of search agents utilized. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes a modified version of IFDO, called M-IFDO. The enhancement is conducted by updating the location of the scout bee to the IFDO to move the scout bees to achieve better performance and optimal solutions. More specifically, two parameters in IFDO, which are alignment and cohesion, are removed. Instead, the Lambda parameter is replaced in the place of alignment and cohesion. To verify the performance of the newly introduced algorithm, M-IFDO is tested on 19 basic benchmark functions, 10 IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation (CEC-C06 2019), and five real-world problems. M-IFDO is compared against five state-of-the-art algorithms: Improved Fitness Dependent Optimizer (IFDO), Improving Multi-Objective Differential Evolution algorithm (IMODE), Hybrid Sampling Evolution Strategy (HSES), Linear Success-History based Parameter Adaptation for Differential Evolution (LSHADE) and CMA-ES Integrated with an Occasional Restart Strategy and Increasing Population Size and An Iterative Local Search (NBIPOP-aCMAES). The verification criteria are based on how well the algorithm reaches convergence, memory usage, and statistical results. The results show that M-IFDO surpasses its competitors in several cases on the benchmark functions and five real-world problems.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Neural & Evolutionary
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Learning using Rectified Linear Units (ReLU)
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Generative Adversarial Text to Image Synthesis
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Search
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learning
๐
๐
Old Age
Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networks
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted