Algorithms for Sparse LPN and LSPN Against Low-noise
July 27, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Xue Chen, Wenxuan Shu, Zhaienhe Zhou
arXiv ID
2407.19215
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Citations
4
Venue
Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
We consider sparse variants of the classical Learning Parities with random Noise (LPN) problem. Our main contribution is a new algorithmic framework that provides learning algorithms against low-noise for both Learning Sparse Parities (LSPN) problem and sparse LPN problem. Different from previous approaches for LSPN and sparse LPN, this framework has a simple structure and runs in polynomial space. Let $n$ be the dimension, $k$ denote the sparsity, and $Ξ·$ be the noise rate. As a fundamental problem in computational learning theory, Learning Sparse Parities with Noise (LSPN) assumes the hidden parity is $k$-sparse. While a simple enumeration algorithm takes ${n \choose k}=O(n/k)^k$ time, previously known results stills need ${n \choose k/2} = Ξ©(n/k)^{k/2}$ time for any noise rate $Ξ·$. Our framework provides a LSPN algorithm runs in time $O(Ξ·\cdot n/k)^k$ for any noise rate $Ξ·$, which improves the state-of-the-art of LSPN whenever $Ξ·\in ( k/n,\sqrt{k/n})$. The sparse LPN problem is closely related to the classical problem of refuting random $k$-CSP and has been widely used in cryptography as the hardness assumption. Different from the standard LPN, it samples random $k$-sparse vectors. Because the number of $k$-sparse vectors is ${n \choose k}<n^k$, sparse LPN has learning algorithms in polynomial time when $m>n^{k/2}$. However, much less is known about learning algorithms for constant $k$ like 3 and $m<n^{k/2}$ samples, except the Gaussian elimination algorithm of time $e^{Ξ·n}$. Our framework provides a learning algorithm in $e^{O(Ξ·\cdot n^{\frac{Ξ΄+1}{2}})}$ time given $Ξ΄\in (0,1)$ and $m \approx n^{1+(1-Ξ΄)\cdot \frac{k-1}{2}}$ samples. This improves previous learning algorithms. For example, in the classical setting of $k=3$ and $m=n^{1.4}$, our algorithm would be faster than than previous approaches for any $Ξ·<n^{-0.7}$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted