Log Diameter Rounds MST Verification and Sensitivity in MPC
August 01, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Sam Coy, Artur Czumaj, Gopinath Mishra, Anish Mukherjee
arXiv ID
2408.00398
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
0
Venue
ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We consider two natural variants of the problem of minimum spanning tree (MST) of a graph in the parallel setting: MST verification (verifying if a given tree is an MST) and the sensitivity analysis of an MST (finding the lowest cost replacement edge for each edge of the MST). These two problems have been studied extensively for sequential algorithms and for parallel algorithms in the PRAM model of computation. In this paper, we extend the study to the standard model of Massive Parallel Computation (MPC). It is known that for graphs of diameter $D$, the connectivity problem can be solved in $O(\log D + \log\log n)$ rounds on an MPC with low local memory (each machine can store only $O(n^Ξ΄)$ words for an arbitrary constant $Ξ΄> 0$) and with linear global memory, that is, with optimal utilization. However, for the related task of finding an MST, we need $Ξ©(\log D_{\text{MST}})$ rounds, where $D_{\text{MST}}$ denotes the diameter of the minimum spanning tree. The state of the art upper bound for MST is $O(\log n)$ rounds; the result follows by simulating existing PRAM algorithms. While this bound may be optimal for general graphs, the benchmark of connectivity and lower bound for MST suggest the target bound of $O(\log D_{\text{MST}})$ rounds, or possibly $O(\log D_{\text{MST}} + \log\log n)$ rounds. As for now, we do not know if this bound is achievable for the MST problem on an MPC with low local memory and linear global memory. In this paper, we show that two natural variants of the MST problem: MST verification and sensitivity analysis of an MST, can be completed in $O(\log D_T)$ rounds on an MPC with low local memory and with linear global memory; here $D_T$ is the diameter of the input ``candidate MST'' $T$. The algorithms asymptotically match our lower bound, conditioned on the 1-vs-2-cycle conjecture.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted