Online Matrix Completion: A Collaborative Approach with Hott Items

August 11, 2024 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› International Conference on Machine Learning

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Dheeraj Baby, Soumyabrata Pal arXiv ID 2408.05843 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.IR, stat.ML Citations 0 Venue International Conference on Machine Learning Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We investigate the low rank matrix completion problem in an online setting with ${M}$ users, ${N}$ items, ${T}$ rounds, and an unknown rank-$r$ reward matrix ${R}\in \mathbb{R}^{{M}\times {N}}$. This problem has been well-studied in the literature and has several applications in practice. In each round, we recommend ${S}$ carefully chosen distinct items to every user and observe noisy rewards. In the regime where ${M},{N} >> {T}$, we propose two distinct computationally efficient algorithms for recommending items to users and analyze them under the benign \emph{hott items} assumption.1) First, for ${S}=1$, under additional incoherence/smoothness assumptions on ${R}$, we propose the phased algorithm \textsc{PhasedClusterElim}. Our algorithm obtains a near-optimal per-user regret of $\tilde{O}({N}{M}^{-1}(ฮ”^{-1}+ฮ”_{hott}^{-2}))$ where $ฮ”_{hott},ฮ”$ are problem-dependent gap parameters with $ฮ”_{hott} >> ฮ”$ almost always. 2) Second, we consider a simplified setting with ${S}=r$ where we make significantly milder assumptions on ${R}$. Here, we introduce another phased algorithm, \textsc{DeterminantElim}, to derive a regret guarantee of $\widetilde{O}({N}{M}^{-1/r}ฮ”_{det}^{-1}))$ where $ฮ”_{det}$ is another problem-dependent gap. Both algorithms crucially use collaboration among users to jointly eliminate sub-optimal items for groups of users successively in phases, but with distinctive and novel approaches.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted