DeepREST: Automated Test Case Generation for REST APIs Exploiting Deep Reinforcement Learning
August 16, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Davide Corradini, Zeno Montolli, Michele Pasqua, Mariano Ceccato
arXiv ID
2408.08594
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Citations
16
Venue
International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Automatically crafting test scenarios for REST APIs helps deliver more reliable and trustworthy web-oriented systems. However, current black-box testing approaches rely heavily on the information available in the API's formal documentation, i.e., the OpenAPI Specification (OAS for short). While useful, the OAS mostly covers syntactic aspects of the API (e.g., producer-consumer relations between operations, input value properties, and additional constraints in natural language), and it lacks a deeper understanding of the API business logic. Missing semantics include implicit ordering (logic dependency) between operations and implicit input-value constraints. These limitations hinder the ability of black-box testing tools to generate truly effective test cases automatically. This paper introduces DeepREST, a novel black-box approach for automatically testing REST APIs. It leverages deep reinforcement learning to uncover implicit API constraints, that is, constraints hidden from API documentation. Curiosity-driven learning guides an agent in the exploration of the API and learns an effective order to test its operations. This helps identify which operations to test first to take the API in a testable state and avoid failing API interactions later. At the same time, experience gained on successful API interactions is leveraged to drive accurate input data generation (i.e., what parameters to use and how to pick their values). Additionally, DeepREST alternates exploration with exploitation by mutating successful API interactions to improve test coverage and collect further experience. Our empirical validation suggests that the proposed approach is very effective in achieving high test coverage and fault detection and superior to a state-of-the-art baseline.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted