ML Study of MaliciousTransactions in Ethereum

August 16, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Advances in Knowledge-Based Systems, Data Science, and Cybersecurity

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Natan Katz arXiv ID 2408.08749 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 0 Venue Advances in Knowledge-Based Systems, Data Science, and Cybersecurity Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Smart contracts are a major tool in Ethereum transactions. Therefore hackers can exploit them by adding code vulnerabilities to their sources and using these vulnerabilities for performing malicious transactions. This paper presents two successful approaches for detecting malicious contracts: one uses opcode and relies on GPT2 and the other uses the Solidity source and a LORA fine-tuned CodeLlama. Finally, we present an XGBOOST model that combines gas properties and Hexa-decimal signatures for detecting malicious transactions. This approach relies on early assumptions that maliciousness is manifested by the uncommon usage of the contracts' functions and the effort to pursue the transaction.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted