RTFM: How hard are IoT platform providers making it for their developers?

September 04, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› CPSIOTSEC@CCS

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Andrew Baldrian, Joseph Hallett arXiv ID 2409.02735 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 0 Venue CPSIOTSEC@CCS Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) devices routinely have security issues, but are the platform designers providing enough support to IoT developers for them to easily implement security features for their platforms? We surveyed the documentation, code and guidance from nine IoT manufacturers to look at what guidance they provided for implementing three security features required by several security standards (secure boot, device identity keys and unique per device passwords). We find that more needs to be done to support developers if we want them to adopt security features -- especially in the face of incoming legislation that will require developers to implement them.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted