Revolutionizing Database Q&A with Large Language Models: Comprehensive Benchmark and Evaluation
September 05, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yihang Zheng, Bo Li, Zhenghao Lin, Yi Luo, Xuanhe Zhou, Chen Lin, Jinsong Su, Guoliang Li, Shifu Li
arXiv ID
2409.04475
Category
cs.DB: Databases
Cross-listed
cs.AI
Citations
4
Venue
Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
The development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized QA across various industries, including the database domain. However, there is still a lack of a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate the capabilities of different LLMs and their modular components in database QA. To this end, we introduce DQABench, the first comprehensive database QA benchmark for LLMs. DQABench features an innovative LLM-based method to automate the generation, cleaning, and rewriting of evaluation dataset, resulting in over 200,000 QA pairs in English and Chinese, separately. These QA pairs cover a wide range of database-related knowledge extracted from manuals, online communities, and database instances. This inclusion allows for an additional assessment of LLMs' Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Tool Invocation Generation (TIG) capabilities in the database QA task. Furthermore, we propose a comprehensive LLM-based database QA testbed DQATestbed. This testbed is highly modular and scalable, with basic and advanced components such as Question Classification Routing (QCR), RAG, TIG, and Prompt Template Engineering (PTE). Moreover, DQABench provides a comprehensive evaluation pipeline that computes various metrics throughout a standardized evaluation process to ensure the accuracy and fairness of the evaluation. We use DQABench to evaluate the database QA capabilities under the proposed testbed comprehensively. The evaluation reveals findings like (i) the strengths and limitations of nine LLM-based QA bots and (ii) the performance impact and potential improvements of various service components (e.g., QCR, RAG, TIG). Our benchmark and findings will guide the future development of LLM-based database QA research.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Databases
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Untangling Blockchain: A Data Processing View of Blockchain Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Converting Static Image Datasets to Spiking Neuromorphic Datasets Using Saccades
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
BLOCKBENCH: A Framework for Analyzing Private Blockchains
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inference
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted