KModels: Unlocking AI for Business Applications
September 08, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Roy Abitbol, Eyal Cohen, Muhammad Kanaan, Bhavna Agrawal, Yingjie Li, Anuradha Bhamidipaty, Erez Bilgory
arXiv ID
2409.05919
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Cross-listed
cs.AI
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to rapidly advance, there is a growing demand to integrate AI capabilities into existing business applications. However, a significant gap exists between the rapid progress in AI and how slowly AI is being embedded into business environments. Deploying well-performing lab models into production settings, especially in on-premise environments, often entails specialized expertise and imposes a heavy burden of model management, creating significant barriers to implementing AI models in real-world applications. KModels leverages proven libraries and platforms (Kubeflow Pipelines, KServe) to streamline AI adoption by supporting both AI developers and consumers. It allows model developers to focus solely on model development and share models as transportable units (Templates), abstracting away complex production deployment concerns. KModels enables AI consumers to eliminate the need for a dedicated data scientist, as the templates encapsulate most data science considerations while providing business-oriented control. This paper presents the architecture of KModels and the key decisions that shape it. We outline KModels' main components as well as its interfaces. Furthermore, we explain how KModels is highly suited for on-premise deployment but can also be used in cloud environments. The efficacy of KModels is demonstrated through the successful deployment of three AI models within an existing Work Order Management system. These models operate in a client's data center and are trained on local data, without data scientist intervention. One model improved the accuracy of Failure Code specification for work orders from 46% to 83%, showcasing the substantial benefit of accessible and localized AI solutions.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted