Predicting Trust Dynamics Type Using Seven Personal Characteristics
September 11, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Hyesun Chung, X. Jessie Yang
arXiv ID
2409.07406
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
0
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
This study aims to explore the associations between individuals' trust dynamics in automated/autonomous technologies and their personal characteristics, and to further examine whether personal characteristics can be used to predict a user's trust dynamics type. We conducted a human-subject experiment (N=130) in which participants performed a simulated surveillance task assisted by an automated threat detector. Using a pre-experimental survey covering 12 constructs and 28 dimensions, we collected data on participants' personal characteristics. Based on the experimental data, we performed k-means clustering and identified three trust dynamics types. Subsequently, we conducted one-way Analyses of Variance to evaluate differences among the three trust dynamics types in terms of personal characteristics, behaviors, performance, and post-experimental ratings. Participants were clustered into three groups, namely Bayesian decision makers, disbelievers, and oscillators. Results showed that the clusters differ significantly in seven personal characteristics: masculinity, positive affect, extraversion, neuroticism, intellect, performance expectancy, and high expectations. The disbelievers tend to have high neuroticism and low performance expectancy. The oscillators tend to have higher scores in masculinity, positive affect, extraversion, and intellect. We also found significant differences in behaviors, performance, and post-experimental ratings across the three groups. The disbelievers are the least likely to blindly follow the recommendations made by the automated threat detector. Based on the significant personal characteristics, we developed a decision tree model to predict the trust dynamics type with an accuracy of 70%. This model offers promising implications for identifying individuals whose trust dynamics may deviate from a Bayesian pattern.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted