Testing the Test: Observations When Assessing Visualization Literacy of Domain Experts

September 12, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Seyda Γ–ney, Moataz Abdelaal, Kuno Kurzhals, Paul Betz, Cordula Kropp, Daniel Weiskopf arXiv ID 2409.08101 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 2 Venue Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Various standardized tests exist that assess individuals' visualization literacy. Their use can help to draw conclusions from studies. However, it is not taken into account that the test itself can create a pressure situation where participants might fear being exposed and assessed negatively. This is especially problematic when testing domain experts in design studies. We conducted interviews with experts from different domains performing the Mini-VLAT test for visualization literacy to identify potential problems. Our participants reported that the time limit per question, ambiguities in the questions and visualizations, and missing steps in the test procedure mainly had an impact on their performance and content. We discuss possible changes to the test design to address these issues and how such assessment methods could be integrated into existing evaluation procedures.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted