Kernelization Complexity of Solution Discovery Problems

September 25, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mario Grobler, Stephanie Maaz, Amer E. Mouawad, Naomi Nishimura, Vijayaragunathan Ramamoorthi, Sebastian Siebertz arXiv ID 2409.17250 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC, math.CO Citations 2 Venue International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In the solution discovery variant of a vertex (edge) subset problem $Ξ $ on graphs, we are given an initial configuration of tokens on the vertices (edges) of an input graph $G$ together with a budget $b$. The question is whether we can transform this configuration into a feasible solution of $Ξ $ on $G$ with at most $b$ modification steps. We consider the token sliding variant of the solution discovery framework, where each modification step consists of sliding a token to an adjacent vertex (edge). The framework of solution discovery was recently introduced by Fellows et al. [Fellows et al., ECAI 2023] and for many solution discovery problems the classical as well as the parameterized complexity has been established. In this work, we study the kernelization complexity of the solution discovery variants of Vertex Cover, Independent Set, Dominating Set, Shortest Path, Matching, and Vertex Cut with respect to the parameters number of tokens $k$, discovery budget $b$, as well as structural parameters such as pathwidth.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted