FlowBench: A Large Scale Benchmark for Flow Simulation over Complex Geometries
September 26, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Ronak Tali, Ali Rabeh, Cheng-Hau Yang, Mehdi Shadkhah, Samundra Karki, Abhisek Upadhyaya, Suriya Dhakshinamoorthy, Marjan Saadati, Soumik Sarkar, Adarsh Krishnamurthy, Chinmay Hegde, Aditya Balu, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian
arXiv ID
2409.18032
Category
physics.flu-dyn
Cross-listed
cs.LG,
cs.NE
Citations
13
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Simulating fluid flow around arbitrary shapes is key to solving various engineering problems. However, simulating flow physics across complex geometries remains numerically challenging and computationally resource-intensive, particularly when using conventional PDE solvers. Machine learning methods offer attractive opportunities to create fast and adaptable PDE solvers. However, benchmark datasets to measure the performance of such methods are scarce, especially for flow physics across complex geometries. We introduce FlowBench, a dataset for neural simulators with over 10K samples, which is currently larger than any publicly available flow physics dataset. FlowBench contains flow simulation data across complex geometries (\textit{parametric vs. non-parametric}), spanning a range of flow conditions (\textit{Reynolds number and Grashoff number}), capturing a diverse array of flow phenomena (\textit{steady vs. transient; forced vs. free convection}), and for both 2D and 3D. FlowBench contains over 10K data samples, with each sample the outcome of a fully resolved, direct numerical simulation using a well-validated simulator framework designed for modeling transport phenomena in complex geometries. For each sample, we include velocity, pressure, and temperature field data at 3 different resolutions and several summary statistics features of engineering relevance (such as coefficients of lift and drag, and Nusselt numbers). %Additionally, we include masks and signed distance fields for each shape. We envision that FlowBench will enable evaluating the interplay between complex geometry, coupled flow phenomena, and data sufficiency on the performance of current, and future, neural PDE solvers. We enumerate several evaluation metrics to help rank order the performance of neural PDE solvers. We benchmark the performance of several baseline methods including FNO, CNO, WNO, and DeepONet.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β physics.flu-dyn
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
NVIDIA SimNet^{TM}: an AI-accelerated multi-physics simulation framework
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Teaching the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations to Fast Neural Surrogate Models in 3D
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Prediction of Reynolds Stresses in High-Mach-Number Turbulent Boundary Layers using Physics-Informed Machine Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
From Deep to Physics-Informed Learning of Turbulence: Diagnostics
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted