Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection based on Static Analysis and Multi-Objective Search

September 30, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Dongcheng Li, W. Eric Wong, Xiaodan Wang, Sean Pan, Liang-Seng Koh arXiv ID 2410.00282 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 2 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
This paper introduces a method for detecting vulnerabilities in smart contracts using static analysis and a multi-objective optimization algorithm. We focus on four types of vulnerabilities: reentrancy, call stack overflow, integer overflow, and timestamp dependencies. Initially, smart contracts are compiled into an abstract syntax tree to analyze relationships between contracts and functions, including calls, inheritance, and data flow. These analyses are transformed into static evaluations and intermediate representations that reveal internal relations. Based on these representations, we examine contract's functions, variables, and data dependencies to detect the specified vulnerabilities. To enhance detection accuracy and coverage, we apply a multi-objective optimization algorithm to the static analysis process. This involves assigning initial numeric values to input data and monitoring changes in statement coverage and detection accuracy. Using coverage and accuracy as fitness values, we calculate Pareto front and crowding distance values to select the best individuals for the new parent population, iterating until optimization criteria are met. We validate our approach using an open-source dataset collected from Etherscan, containing 6,693 smart contracts. Experimental results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art tools in terms of coverage, accuracy, efficiency, and effectiveness in detecting the targeted vulnerabilities.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted