Subexponential Algorithms for Clique Cover on Unit Disk and Unit Ball Graphs

October 04, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Tomohiro Koana, Nidhi Purohit, Kirill Simonov arXiv ID 2410.03609 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CG Citations 2 Venue International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In Clique Cover, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the task is to partition the vertices of $G$ into $k$ cliques. Clique Cover on unit ball graphs has a natural interpretation as a clustering problem, where the objective function is the maximum diameter of a cluster. Many classical NP-hard problems are known to admit $2^{O(n^{(1 - 1/d)})}$-time algorithms on unit ball graphs in $\mathbb{R}^d$ [de Berg et al., SIAM J. Comp 2018]. A notable exception is the Maximum Clique problem, which admits a polynomial-time algorithm on unit disk graphs and a subexponential algorithm on unit ball graphs in $\mathbb{R}^3$, but no subexponential algorithm on unit ball graphs in dimensions 4 or larger, assuming the ETH [Bonamy et al., JACM 2021]. In this work, we show that Clique Cover also suffers from a "curse of dimensionality", albeit in a significantly different way compared to Maximum Clique. We present a $2^{O(\sqrt{n})}$-time algorithm for unit disk graphs and argue that it is tight under the ETH. On the other hand, we show that Clique Cover does not admit a $2^{o(n)}$-time algorithm on unit ball graphs in dimension $5$, unless the ETH fails.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted