Exploiting Distribution Constraints for Scalable and Efficient Image Retrieval
October 09, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Learning Representations
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Mohammad Omama, Po-han Li, Sandeep P. Chinchali
arXiv ID
2410.07022
Category
cs.IR: Information Retrieval
Citations
3
Venue
International Conference on Learning Representations
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Image retrieval is crucial in robotics and computer vision, with downstream applications in robot place recognition and vision-based product recommendations. Modern retrieval systems face two key challenges: scalability and efficiency. State-of-the-art image retrieval systems train specific neural networks for each dataset, an approach that lacks scalability. Furthermore, since retrieval speed is directly proportional to embedding size, existing systems that use large embeddings lack efficiency. To tackle scalability, recent works propose using off-the-shelf foundation models. However, these models, though applicable across datasets, fall short in achieving performance comparable to that of dataset-specific models. Our key observation is that, while foundation models capture necessary subtleties for effective retrieval, the underlying distribution of their embedding space can negatively impact cosine similarity searches. We introduce Autoencoders with Strong Variance Constraints (AE-SVC), which, when used for projection, significantly improves the performance of foundation models. We provide an in-depth theoretical analysis of AE-SVC. Addressing efficiency, we introduce Single-shot Similarity Space Distillation ((SS)$_2$D), a novel approach to learn embeddings with adaptive sizes that offers a better trade-off between size and performance. We conducted extensive experiments on four retrieval datasets, including Stanford Online Products (SoP) and Pittsburgh30k, using four different off-the-shelf foundation models, including DinoV2 and CLIP. AE-SVC demonstrates up to a $16\%$ improvement in retrieval performance, while (SS)$_2$D shows a further $10\%$ improvement for smaller embedding sizes.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Information Retrieval
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
Old Age
Neural Graph Collaborative Filtering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Prediction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer
R.I.P.
π
404 Not Found
Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendation
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Personalized Top-N Sequential Recommendation via Convolutional Sequence Embedding
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted