Tracing Human Stress from Physiological Signals using UWB Radar
October 14, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Internet of Things Journal
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Jia Xu, Teng Xiao, Pin Lv, Zhe Chen, Chao Cai, Yang Zhang, Zehui Xiong
arXiv ID
2410.10155
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Cross-listed
cs.AR,
cs.LG,
eess.SP
Citations
3
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Stress tracing is an important research domain that supports many applications, such as health care and stress management; and its closest related works are derived from stress detection. However, these existing works cannot well address two important challenges facing stress detection. First, most of these studies involve asking users to wear physiological sensors to detect their stress states, which has a negative impact on the user experience. Second, these studies have failed to effectively utilize multimodal physiological signals, which results in less satisfactory detection results. This paper formally defines the stress tracing problem, which emphasizes the continuous detection of human stress states. A novel deep stress tracing method, named DST, is presented. Note that DST proposes tracing human stress based on physiological signals collected by a noncontact ultrawideband radar, which is more friendly to users when collecting their physiological signals. In DST, a signal extraction module is carefully designed at first to robustly extract multimodal physiological signals from the raw RF data of the radar, even in the presence of body movement. Afterward, a multimodal fusion module is proposed in DST to ensure that the extracted multimodal physiological signals can be effectively fused and utilized. Extensive experiments are conducted on three real-world datasets, including one self-collected dataset and two publicity datasets. Experimental results show that the proposed DST method significantly outperforms all the baselines in terms of tracing human stress states. On average, DST averagely provides a 6.31% increase in detection accuracy on all datasets, compared with the best baselines.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted