Users' Perception on Appropriateness of Robotic Coaching Assistant's Disclosure Behaviors

October 14, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Atikkhan Faridkhan Nilgar, Manuel Dietrich, Kristof Van Laerhoven arXiv ID 2410.10550 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Social robots have emerged as valuable contributors to individuals' well-being coaching. Notably, their integration into long-term human coaching trials shows particular promise, emphasizing a complementary role alongside human coaches rather than outright replacement. In this context, robots serve as supportive entities during coaching sessions, offering insights based on their knowledge about users' well-being and activity. Traditionally, such insights have been gathered through methods like written self-reports or wearable data visualizations. However, the disclosure of people's information by a robot raises concerns regarding privacy, appropriateness, and trust. To address this, we conducted an initial study with [n = 22] participants to quantify their perceptions of privacy regarding disclosures made by a robot coaching assistant. The study was conducted online, presenting participants with six prerecorded scenarios illustrating various types of information disclosure and the robot's role, ranging from active on-demand to proactive communication conditions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted