Relating Left and Right Extensions of Maximal Repeats

October 21, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Shunsuke Inenaga, Dmitry Kosolobov arXiv ID 2410.15958 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 2 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The compact directed acyclic word graph (CDAWG) of a string $T$ is an index occupying $O(\mathsf{e})$ space, where $\mathsf{e}$ is the number of right extensions of maximal repeats in $T$. For highly repetitive datasets, the measure $\mathsf{e}$ typically is small compared to the length $n$ of $T$ and, thus, the CDAWG serves as a compressed index. Unlike other compressibility measures (as LZ77, string attractors, BWT runs, etc.), $\mathsf{e}$ is very unstable with respect to reversals: the CDAWG of the reversed string $\overset{{}_{\leftarrow}}{T} = T[n] \cdots T[2] T[1]$ has size $O(\overset{{}_{\leftarrow}}{\mathsf{e}})$, where $\overset{{}_{\leftarrow}}{\mathsf{e}}$ is the number of left extensions of maximal repeats in $T$, and there are strings $T$ with $\frac{\overset{{}_{\leftarrow}}{\mathsf{e}}}{\mathsf{e}} \in Ξ©(\sqrt{n})$. In this note, we prove that this lower bound is tight: $\frac{\overset{{}_{\leftarrow}}{\mathsf{e}}}{\mathsf{e}} \in O(\sqrt{n})$. Furthermore, given the alphabet size $Οƒ$, we establish the alphabet-dependent bound $\frac{\overset{{}_{\leftarrow}}{\mathsf{e}}}{\mathsf{e}} \le \min\{\frac{2n}Οƒ, Οƒ\}$ and we show that it is asymptotically tight.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted