User-Centered Design of Socially Assistive Robotic Combined with Non-Immersive Virtual Reality-based Dyadic Activities for Older Adults Residing in Long Term Care Facilities
October 28, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Ritam Ghosh, Nibraas Khan, Miroslava Migovich, Judith A. Tate, Cathy Maxwell, Emily Latshaw, Paul Newhouse, Douglas W. Scharre, Alai Tan, Kelley Colopietro, Lorraine C. Mion, Nilanjan Sarkar
arXiv ID
2410.21197
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Cross-listed
eess.SY
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Apathy impairs the quality of life for older adults and their care providers. While few pharmacological remedies exist, current non-pharmacologic approaches are resource intensive. To address these concerns, this study utilizes a user-centered design (UCD) process to develop and test a set of dyadic activities that provide physical, cognitive, and social stimuli to older adults residing in long-term care (LTC) communities. Within the design, a novel framework that combines socially assistive robots and non-immersive virtual reality (SAR-VR) emphasizing human-robot interaction (HRI) and human-computer interaction (HCI) is utilized with the roles of the robots being coach and entertainer. An interdisciplinary team of engineers, nurses, and physicians collaborated with an advisory panel comprising LTC activity coordinators, staff, and residents to prototype the activities. The study resulted in four virtual activities: three with the humanoid robot, Nao, and one with the animal robot, Aibo. Fourteen participants tested the acceptability of the different components of the system and provided feedback at different stages of development. Participant approval increased significantly over successive iterations of the system highlighting the importance of stakeholder feedback. Five LTC staff members successfully set up the system with minimal help from the researchers, demonstrating the usability of the system for caregivers. Rationale for activity selection, design changes, and both quantitative and qualitative results on the acceptability and usability of the system have been presented. The paper discusses the challenges encountered in developing activities for older adults in LTCs and underscores the necessity of the UCD process to address them.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted