Improved Spectral Density Estimation via Explicit and Implicit Deflation

October 29, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Rajarshi Bhattacharjee, Rajesh Jayaram, Cameron Musco, Christopher Musco, Archan Ray arXiv ID 2410.21690 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed math.NA Citations 7 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We study algorithms for approximating the spectral density of a symmetric matrix $A$ that is accessed through matrix-vector product queries. By combining a previously studied Chebyshev polynomial moment matching method with a deflation step that approximately projects off the largest magnitude eigendirections of $A$ before estimating the spectral density, we give an $Ρ\cdotσ_\ell(A)$ error approximation to the spectral density in the Wasserstein-$1$ metric using $O(\ell\log n+ 1/Ρ)$ matrix-vector products, where $σ_\ell(A)$ is the $\ell^{th}$ largest singular value of $A$. In the common case when $A$ exhibits fast singular value decay, our bound can be much stronger than prior work, which gives an error bound of $Ρ\cdot ||A||_2$ using $O(1/Ρ)$ matrix-vector products. We also show that it is nearly tight: any algorithm giving error $Ρ\cdot σ_\ell(A)$ must use $Ω(\ell+1/Ρ)$ matrix-vector products. We further show that the popular Stochastic Lanczos Quadrature (SLQ) method matches the above bound, even though SLQ itself is parameter-free and performs no explicit deflation. This bound explains the strong practical performance of SLQ, and motivates a simple variant of SLQ that achieves an even tighter error bound. Our error bound for SLQ leverages an analysis that views it as an implicit polynomial moment matching method, along with recent results on low-rank approximation with single-vector Krylov methods. We use these results to show that the method can perform implicit deflation as part of moment matching.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted