Connectivity Certificate against Bounded-Degree Faults: Simpler, Better and Supporting Vertex Faults
November 17, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Merav Parter, Elad Tzalik
arXiv ID
2411.11054
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
An $f$-edge (or vertex) connectivity certificate is a sparse subgraph that maintains connectivity under the failure of at most $f$ edges (or vertices). It is well known that any $n$-vertex graph admits an $f$-edge (or vertex) connectivity certificate with $Ξ(f n)$ edges (Nagamochi and Ibaraki, Algorithmica 1992). A recent work by (Bodwin, Haeupler and Parter, SODA 2024) introduced a new and considerably stronger variant of connectivity certificates that can preserve connectivity under any failing set of edges with bounded degree. For every $n$-vertex graph $G=(V,E)$ and a degree threshold $f$, an $f$-Edge-Faulty-Degree (EFD) certificate is a subgraph $H \subseteq G$ with the following guarantee: For any subset $F \subseteq E$ with $deg(F)\leq f$ and every pair $u,v \in V$, $u$ and $v$ are connected in $H - F$ iff they are connected in $G - F$. For example, a $1$-EFD certificate preserves connectivity under the failing of any matching edge set $F$ (hence, possibly $|F|=Ξ(n)$). In their work, [BHP'24] presented an expander-based approach (e.g., using the tools of expander decomposition and expander routing) for computing $f$-EFD certificates with $O(f n \cdot poly(\log n))$ edges. They also provided a lower bound of $Ξ©(f n\cdot \log_f n)$, hence $Ξ©(n\log n)$ for $f=O(1)$. In this work, we settle the optimal existential size bounds for $f$-EFD certificates (up to constant factors), and also extend it to support vertex failures with bounded degrees (where each vertex is incident to at most $f$ faulty vertices). Specifically, we show that for every $n>f/2$, any $n$-vertex graph admits an $f$-EFD (and $f$-VFD) certificates with $O(f n \cdot \log(n/f))$ edges and that this bound is tight. Our upper bound arguments are considerably simpler compared to prior work, do not use expanders, and only exploit the basic structure of bounded degree edge and vertex cuts.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted