Preference-Conditioned Gradient Variations for Multi-Objective Quality-Diversity

November 19, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hannah Janmohamed, Maxence Faldor, Thomas Pierrot, Antoine Cully arXiv ID 2411.12433 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Citations 1 Venue ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In a variety of domains, from robotics to finance, Quality-Diversity algorithms have been used to generate collections of both diverse and high-performing solutions. Multi-Objective Quality-Diversity algorithms have emerged as a promising approach for applying these methods to complex, multi-objective problems. However, existing methods are limited by their search capabilities. For example, Multi-Objective Map-Elites depends on random genetic variations which struggle in high-dimensional search spaces. Despite efforts to enhance search efficiency with gradient-based mutation operators, existing approaches consider updating solutions to improve on each objective separately rather than achieving desired trade-offs. In this work, we address this limitation by introducing Multi-Objective Map-Elites with Preference-Conditioned Policy-Gradient and Crowding Mechanisms: a new Multi-Objective Quality-Diversity algorithm that uses preference-conditioned policy-gradient mutations to efficiently discover promising regions of the objective space and crowding mechanisms to promote a uniform distribution of solutions on the non-dominated front. We evaluate our approach on six robotics locomotion tasks and show that our method outperforms or matches all state-of-the-art Multi-Objective Quality-Diversity methods in all six, including two newly proposed tri-objective tasks. Importantly, our method also achieves a smoother set of trade-offs, as measured by newly-proposed sparsity-based metrics.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted