Datalog with First-Class Facts

November 21, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Thomas Gilray, Arash Sahebolamri, Yihao Sun, Sowmith Kunapaneni, Sidharth Kumar, Kristopher Micinski arXiv ID 2411.14330 Category cs.DB: Databases Cross-listed cs.PL Citations 1 Venue Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Datalog is a popular logic programming language for deductive reasoning tasks in a wide array of applications, including business analytics, program analysis, and ontological reasoning. However, Datalog's restriction to flat facts over atomic constants leads to challenges in working with tree-structured data, such as derivation trees or abstract syntax trees. To ameliorate Datalog's restrictions, popular extensions of Datalog support features such as existential quantification in rule heads (Datalog$^\pm$, Datalog$^\exists$) or algebraic data types (SoufflΓ©). Unfortunately, these are imperfect solutions for reasoning over structured and recursive data types, with general existentials leading to complex implementations requiring unification, and ADTs unable to trigger rule evaluation and failing to support efficient indexing. We present DL$^{\exists!}$, a Datalog with first-class facts, wherein every fact is identified with a Skolem term unique to the fact. We show that this restriction offers an attractive price point for Datalog-based reasoning over tree-shaped data, demonstrating its application to databases, artificial intelligence, and programming languages. We implemented DL$^{\exists!}$ as a system \slog{}, which leverages the uniqueness restriction of DL$^{\exists!}$ to enable a communication-avoiding, massively-parallel implementation built on MPI. We show that Slog outperforms leading systems (Nemo, Vlog, RDFox, and SoufflΓ©) on a variety of benchmarks, with the potential to scale to thousands of threads.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Databases

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted