The Landscape of Data Reuse in Interactive Information Retrieval: Motivations, Sources, and Evaluation of Reusability

November 23, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Tianji Jiang, Wenqi Li, Jiqun Liu arXiv ID 2411.15430 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.DL Citations 6 Venue Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Sharing and reusing research data can effectively reduce redundant efforts in data collection and curation, especially for small labs and research teams conducting human-centered system research, and enhance the replicability of evaluation experiments. Building a sustainable data reuse process and culture relies on frameworks that encompass policies, standards, roles, and responsibilities, all of which must address the diverse needs of data providers, curators, and reusers. To advance the knowledge and accumulate empirical understandings on data reuse, this study investigated the data reuse practices of experienced researchers from the area of Interactive Information Retrieval (IIR) studies, where data reuse has been strongly advocated but still remains a challenge. To enhance the knowledge on data reuse behavior and reusability assessment strategies within IIR community, we conducted 21 semi-structured in-depth interviews with IIR researchers from varying demographic backgrounds, institutions, and stages of careers on their motivations, experiences, and concerns over data reuse. We uncovered the reasons, strategies of reusability assessments, and challenges faced by data reusers within the field of IIR as they attempt to reuse researcher data in their studies. The empirical finding improves our understanding of researchers' motivations for reusing data, their approaches to discovering reusable research data, as well as their concerns and criteria for assessing data reusability, and also enriches the on-going discussions on evaluating user-generated data and research resources and promoting community-level data reuse culture and standards.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted