Bow Metrics and Hyperbolicity

November 25, 2024 · The Ethereal · 🏛 arXiv.org

🔮 THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory — exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Feodor F. Dragan, Guillaume Ducoffe, Michel Habib, Laurent Viennot arXiv ID 2411.16548 Category math.CO: Combinatorics Cross-listed cs.DM, cs.DS Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
A ($λ,μ$)-bow metric was defined in (Dragan & Ducoffe, 2023) as a far reaching generalization of an $α_i$-metric (which is equivalent to a ($0,i$)-bow metric). A graph $G=(V,E)$ is said to satisfy ($λ,μ$)-bow metric if for every four vertices $u,v,w,x$ of $G$ the following holds: if two shortest paths $P(u,w)$ and $P(v,x)$ share a common shortest subpath $P(v,w)$ of length more than $λ$ (that is, they overlap by more than $λ$), then the distance between $u$ and $x$ is at least $d_G(u,v)+d_G(v,w)+d_G(w,x)-μ$. ($λ,μ$)-Bow metric can also be considered for all geodesic metric spaces. It was shown by Dragan & Ducoffe that every $δ$-hyperbolic graph (in fact, every $δ$-hyperbolic geodesic metric space) satisfies ($δ, 2δ$)-bow metric. Thus, ($λ,μ$)-bow metric is a common generalization of hyperbolicity and of $α_i$-metric. In this paper, we investigate an intriguing question whether ($λ,μ$)-bow metric implies hyperbolicity in graphs. Note that, this is not the case for general geodesic metric spaces as Euclidean spaces satisfy ($0,0$)-bow metric whereas they have unbounded hyperbolicity. We conjecture that, in graphs, ($λ,μ$)-bow metric indeed implies hyperbolicity and show that our conjecture is true for several large families of graphs.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Combinatorics

🔮 🔮 The Ethereal

Tables of subspace codes

Daniel Heinlein, Michael Kiermaier, ... (+2 more)

math.CO 🏛 arXiv 📚 94 cites 10 years ago