Enhanced anomaly detection in well log data through the application of ensemble GANs
November 29, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Abdulrahman Al-Fakih, A. Koeshidayatullah, Tapan Mukerji, SanLinn I. Kaka
arXiv ID
2411.19875
Category
physics.geo-ph
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.LG
Citations
5
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Although generative adversarial networks (GANs) have shown significant success in modeling data distributions for image datasets, their application to structured or tabular data, such as well logs, remains relatively underexplored. This study extends the ensemble GANs (EGANs) framework to capture the distribution of well log data and detect anomalies that fall outside of these distributions. The proposed approach compares the performance of traditional methods, such as Gaussian mixture models (GMMs), with EGANs in detecting anomalies outside the expected data distributions. For the gamma ray (GR) dataset, EGANs achieved a precision of 0.62 and F1 score of 0.76, outperforming GMM's precision of 0.38 and F1 score of 0.54. Similarly, for travel time (DT), EGANs achieved a precision of 0.70 and F1 score of 0.79, surpassing GMM 0.56 and 0.71. In the neutron porosity (NPHI) dataset, EGANs recorded a precision of 0.53 and F1 score of 0.68, outshining GMM 0.47 and 0.61. For the bulk density (RHOB) dataset, EGANs achieved a precision of 0.52 and an F1 score of 0.67, slightly outperforming GMM, which yielded a precision of 0.50 and an F1 score of 0.65. This work's novelty lies in applying EGANs for well log data analysis, showcasing their ability to learn data patterns and identify anomalies that deviate from them. This approach offers more reliable anomaly detection compared to traditional methods like GMM. The findings highlight the potential of EGANs in enhancing anomaly detection for well log data, delivering significant implications for optimizing drilling strategies and reservoir management through more accurate, data-driven insights into subsurface characterization.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β physics.geo-ph
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Machine-Learning Approach for Earthquake Magnitude Estimation
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Uncertainty Estimation with Deep Learning for Rainfall-Runoff Modelling
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Bayesian-Deep-Learning Estimation of Earthquake Location from Single-Station Observations
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Convolutional Neural Network for Convective Storm Nowcasting Using 3D Doppler Weather Radar Data
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Seismic data interpolation based on U-net with texture loss
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted